Tagged: austin, austin grade, austingrade.com, austingrade.com/cnc, grade
- This topic has 12 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 16 years, 4 months ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- July 27, 2008 at 5:23 am #126507AnonymousInactive
Cars and Coffee July 26th, 2008
Marquee: Lamborghini
As usual you can view the rest at: http://www.austingrade.com/cnc
July 27, 2008 at 5:51 am #130105AnonymousGuestDammit! I show up almost every week, and ALWAYS miss the Veyron. CRAP!!!!
July 27, 2008 at 5:51 am #130080AnonymousGuestDammit! I show up almost every week, and ALWAYS miss the Veyron. CRAP!!!!
August 1, 2008 at 4:18 pm #130108AnonymousInactiveJust picked this guy up. I’m going on a lake trip next week and needed a longer lens for wakeboard/tubing shots. I’ve been contemplating a 70-200 for a while and decided to spring on it since this vacation was coming up. Now to find a suitable spot to shoot from at C&C.
August 1, 2008 at 4:18 pm #130083AnonymousInactiveJust picked this guy up. I’m going on a lake trip next week and needed a longer lens for wakeboard/tubing shots. I’ve been contemplating a 70-200 for a while and decided to spring on it since this vacation was coming up. Now to find a suitable spot to shoot from at C&C.
August 2, 2008 at 2:06 am #130106AnonymousGuestPhiberglass;5218 wrote:Just picked this guy up. I’m going on a lake trip next week and needed a longer lens for wakeboard/tubing shots. I’ve been contemplating a 70-200 for a while and decided to spring on it since this vacation was coming up. Now to find a suitable spot to shoot from at C&C.Got one of those back in ’04, you won’t stop using it for the first 6 months, fantastic lens.
(Mine is actually for sale).August 2, 2008 at 2:06 am #130081AnonymousGuestPhiberglass;5218 wrote:Just picked this guy up. I’m going on a lake trip next week and needed a longer lens for wakeboard/tubing shots. I’ve been contemplating a 70-200 for a while and decided to spring on it since this vacation was coming up. Now to find a suitable spot to shoot from at C&C.Got one of those back in ’04, you won’t stop using it for the first 6 months, fantastic lens.
(Mine is actually for sale).August 2, 2008 at 2:38 am #130109AnonymousInactive@Dents 5230 wrote:
Got one of those back in ’04, you won’t stop using it for the first 6 months, fantastic lens.
(Mine is actually for sale).I’m very excited to use it tomorrow. Are you planning on upgrading to the 2.8 and/or IS version? Now I need to get a 10-22 and I”ll be good for a while. So expensive though >.<
August 2, 2008 at 2:38 am #130084AnonymousInactive@Dents 5230 wrote:
Got one of those back in ’04, you won’t stop using it for the first 6 months, fantastic lens.
(Mine is actually for sale).I’m very excited to use it tomorrow. Are you planning on upgrading to the 2.8 and/or IS version? Now I need to get a 10-22 and I”ll be good for a while. So expensive though >.<
August 2, 2008 at 2:55 am #130107AnonymousGuestPhiberglass;5231 wrote:I’m very excited to use it tomorrow. Are you planning on upgrading to the 2.8 and/or IS version? Now I need to get a 10-22 and I”ll be good for a while. So expensive though >.<I missed that, mine is actually the 2.8 (non IS) version.
Was actually gonna sell the zoom to get the 10-22 wide angle, (which is perfect for walking around at car shows and my magazine work with a digital crop factor camera body).August 2, 2008 at 2:55 am #130082AnonymousGuestPhiberglass;5231 wrote:I’m very excited to use it tomorrow. Are you planning on upgrading to the 2.8 and/or IS version? Now I need to get a 10-22 and I”ll be good for a while. So expensive though >.<I missed that, mine is actually the 2.8 (non IS) version.
Was actually gonna sell the zoom to get the 10-22 wide angle, (which is perfect for walking around at car shows and my magazine work with a digital crop factor camera body).August 2, 2008 at 3:00 am #130110AnonymousInactive@Dents 5232 wrote:
I missed that, mine is actually the 2.8 (non IS) version.
Was actually gonna sell the zoom to get the 10-22 wide angle, (which is perfect for walking around at car shows and my magazine work with a digital crop factor camera body).Yea, I may end up selling this lens for a 10-22, I’ll most likely hang onto it and upgrade to a 2.8 later on and just fork out the money for the 10-22.
August 2, 2008 at 3:00 am #130085AnonymousInactive@Dents 5232 wrote:
I missed that, mine is actually the 2.8 (non IS) version.
Was actually gonna sell the zoom to get the 10-22 wide angle, (which is perfect for walking around at car shows and my magazine work with a digital crop factor camera body).Yea, I may end up selling this lens for a 10-22, I’ll most likely hang onto it and upgrade to a 2.8 later on and just fork out the money for the 10-22.
- AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Irvine Pictures and Video’ is closed to new topics and replies.